[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:21:07 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> every version after he has contributed changes. As we know from Gaiman
We know from Gaiman that the GPL says nothing about going to the toilet
from time to time, but does that mean that GPL'd work authors are never
pissing and
shitting, Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, (continued)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/12
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/13
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/15
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Branimir Maksimovic, 2010/02/16
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/17