Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon

[Alexander Terekhov]

I just can't resist to poke stupid Hyman once again...

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> affect or disparage ownership claims of the other authors. Registration
> then allows the author to sue for infringement.

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/dec/14/busybox-gpl-lawsuit/

"The suit was filed on behalf of the Software Freedom Conservancy
(Conservancy)"

Hey Hyman, care to find any copyright registrations addressed to/from
"the Software Freedom Conservancy (Conservancy)" you retard?

http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=Software+Freedom+Conservancy&Search_Code=NALL&PID=H_LZj_4cL3T27_AZjvFkHET8UpWY&SEQ=20100216135031&CNT=25&HIST=1

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)