[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:47:07 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
RJack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> RJack <user@example.net> wrote:
>>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>> I've told you a hundred times that the Jacobsen appeals court panel
>>> violated CAFC rules.
>> If you were correct, a single time would suffice.
> With Hyman listening? ROFL.
Maybe you've got a point there.
>> Sorry, Rjack, by definition the opinion of that appeals court is the
>> valid one.
> Sorry Alan, some of you foreigners are utterly ignorant of that fact
> that under U.S. law no appeals court can overrule the Supreme Court of
> the United States:
No, I grok that. Perhaps it is the case that this appeals court didn't
actually overrule the Supreme Court. USA law is a complicated beast, you
know.
> "An unlicensed use of the copyright is not an infringement unless it
> conflicts with one of the specific exclusive rights conferred by the
> copyright statute. Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S., at
> 154-155."; SONY CORP. OF AMER. v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., 464
> U.S. 417 (1984).
Katzer's behaviour violated such exclusive rights, namely by distribution
and adaptation.
>> Why can't you simply admit you've been mistaken on this issue for
>> quite a long time? No shame in that, even the lower court got it
>> wrong to begin with.
> Because I'm not legally mistaken and *I* have the Supreme Court of the
> United States on *my* side.
Don't tell me - the chief judge there is your uncle, or something, and he
consults you before each judgement is reached.
> Sincerely,
> RJack :)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, John Hasler, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/22
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/22