[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:45:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> writes:
>>
>> > RJack writes:
>> >> Hyman will just ignore the Supreme Court decision as if it didn't
>> >> exist and continue to quote the Federal Circuit's erroneous finding.
>> >
>> > If the Federal Circuit's finding is in conflict with Supreme Court
>> > precedents why has it not been appealed thereto?
>>
>> This likely should be considered addressed comprehensively with the
>> "scared them out of the water. LOL LOL LOL" babble.
>
> The appeal to CAFC was an interlocutory appeal (no final judgement) from
> an order regarding PI. For the purposes of granting or not granting PI,
> the CAFC error regarding confusion of conditions precedent v. scope
> restrictions v. covenants was made moot by later Winter v. NRDC decision
> of SCOTUS. Did you notice that judge White refused to grant the PI on
> remand as well? Correcting an utterly obvious error by a district judge
> from New Jersey sitting by designation on CAFC panel in a moot PI case
> would be quite a waste of SCOTUS time, don't you think so silly dak?
Not interested in trying to figure out what you believe you are on this
time. After a few dozen of rotten fish from the same barrel, there's
not much incentive in dissecting another one.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, John Hasler, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/22
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20