[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:17:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/23/2010 11:06 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman you retardedly confuse conditions precedent with scope
restrictions and covenants to do (or not do) something "while doing so".
The CAFC appears to agree with me:
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
The clear language of the Artistic License creates conditions
to protect the economic rights at issue in the granting of a
public license. These conditions govern the rights to modify
and distribute the computer programs and files included in the
downloadable software package.
So I can believe a court, or I can believe you. I choose court.
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, John Hasler, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/24
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/22