[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlements
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Settlements |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/25/2010 1:37 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
From pacer 2:05-cv-04753-AHM-SH End date: 2/25/2010
"02/24/2010 380 MINUTES Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz:
Court is advised that the parties have reached a settlement.
When was the last time that a court in a GPL case was "advised that the
parties have reached a settlement" Hyman?
They don't have to, because they file motions delaying
upcoming hearings while the settlement talks go on. But
I seem to recall you whining about those too.
In this case, the court was advised that a settlement had
been reached because they were at the hearing and needed
to stop it.
- Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26