[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlements
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Settlements |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:12:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/26/2010 8:05 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
RJack<user@example.net> writes:
It's obvious the defendants aren't the slightest bit intimidated by
the SFLC clowns.
Why else would they make the GPLed source available in the aftermath of
the settlements?
He means the new defendants. Remember, to anti-GPL cranks,
every case is the one that will finally break the back of
the GPL. Until it doesn't, and then it's because the SFLC
"cut and run" or because the judge was drunk, or it's in a
court whose precedents aren't binding, or any of a million
other excuses.
- Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/25
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26