gnu-music-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

mudela syntax question


From: Tom Cato Amundsen
Subject: mudela syntax question
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 01:12:03 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

GNU Solfege will be using a language very similar (but very
limited compared to) mudela to play and display music. I have
been rewriting parts of the parser this weekend to add support
for beams and get better output.

When combining chords and beams, Lilypond support both
  < [ c8 e> f]     % really \simultaneous{ [c8 e} f]
and
  [ <c8 e> f]      % really [ \simultaneous{c8 e} f]

I guess the last is the preferred, it is easier to read. Are the
first example just something that happens to work, or are both
equal good mudela? (hm, maybe mudela is "whatever works for lily"...)

-- 
Tom Cato Amundsen <address@hidden>
GNU Solfege - free eartraining, http://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]