[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia |
Date: |
07 Feb 2001 09:43:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 |
Bernd Warken <address@hidden> writes:
> I was astonished to get only negative answers to using the GNU
> Free Documentation License. I think it's quite good for getting
> a common license scheme on all kinds of documents. It is quite
> hard to create a fool-proof license from nothing. The FDL has a
> long history of good-looking predecessors that turned out to be
> buggy, and thus dangerous.
The fear was, as I'm sure you understand, that the FDL would fit
mutopia content just about as bad as the GPL. For people that are not
familar with the GPL, the MutopiaBSD is easier to digest. Maybe we
should ask if the FSF, in casu rms, could advise on this.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, David Chan, 2001/02/01
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Chris Sawer, 2001/02/04
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Bernd Warken, 2001/02/06
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, David Chan, 2001/02/07
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, John Sankey, 2001/02/09
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, John Sankey, 2001/02/11
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Bernd Warken, 2001/02/22