[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia
From: |
Bernd Warken |
Subject: |
Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:26:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:29:56AM -0500, John Sankey wrote:
> Current copyright law is disgusting, especially the Disney et.al
> version now current in the USA. Putting something in the pubic domain
> does indeed allow it to be stolen and sequestered by creeps. But, so
> does copylefting (cf. http://www.sankey.ws/bach.html).
>
> I wish there were a solution less ridiculous than getting rid of
> lawyers, but after a lifetime in the business, I have given up on
> both lawyers and creeps. See http://www.sankey.ws/ for the solution
> I've adopted.
>
It's a pity, but your Bach score was not protected by a GNU copyleft,
was it? Self-made copyright/lefts are very dangerous. I do not trust
anything but GNU's GPL and hopefully FDL. I think that the MutopiaBSD
is not secure either. What do you think about it?
Bernd Warken <address@hidden>
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, David Chan, 2001/02/01
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Chris Sawer, 2001/02/04
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Bernd Warken, 2001/02/06
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, David Chan, 2001/02/07
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, John Sankey, 2001/02/09
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia,
Bernd Warken <=
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, John Sankey, 2001/02/11
- Re: GNU FDL License on Mutopia, Bernd Warken, 2001/02/22