[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Once again I don't understand...
From: |
Rune Zedeler |
Subject: |
Re: Once again I don't understand... |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:05:58 +0100 |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> BTW, maybe we should change the naming from interface to something
> else, since BarNumber doesn't "implement an interface". An "interface"
> is just a group of functions and variables. A few of those are
> combined to form the BarNumber, so it's really the otehr way around:
> side-position-interface implements BarNumber.
Yeah, I am used to the Java-namings...
But then...
If it is the interfaces that contain the variables and setting i.e.
NoteHead.font-name affects a variable (font-name) in the font-interface,
then how is it determined which interface to use when multiple
interfaces have the same variable?
I.e. when setting NoteHead.font-relative-size, how is it determined
whether it is the font-relative-size of the font-interface or of the
general-grob-interface that is changed?
> What's a better name for this? Something like "building block"
How about "behaviour", "conduct" or "conductor"?
-Rune