[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] MiniListing already (full) implemented ? TODO or
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] MiniListing already (full) implemented ? TODO or NEWS (STATUS?) |
Date: |
Sun Mar 7 15:07:09 2004 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (UnebigoryĆmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:36:42 +0100,
Thomas Biehler wrote:
>
> But with the maintaned TODO / NEWS files, good cvs commit messages
> and the improved testsuite (perhaps with realizing only_requested_feature.at
> and in_working_feature.at) it improves more and more!
> (Perhaps a tool for evaluate cvs-log is here also TODO !?)
I prefer to write the ChangeLog file by hand. I'll start it again.
> You are the project admin and can / shall !!! request for help!
> Perhaps you should give prioritys!
> (What do you want or plan to do ?)
I am currently rewriting the compiler internals for intrinsic
functions and for better error checking. I'd like to spend my time
in coding more than the administration work until I can finish
writing more robust compiler internals. (There are too much
compiler abort now!)
> The only solution that i see is:
> - make it good and easy for users (=support!),
> - show what the project can (already) do, (good marketing!)
> - make stable, powerfull releases! (--> low priority thinks later!)
> (Everbody loves a good release strategy!)
> - show that the project is active !
> (--> Important step to reach new users / contributors /developers
> They must trust to the project before they investe time!)
I agree. Give me more time :)
Keisuke