gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] New owl pattern.


From: Trevor Morris
Subject: [gnugo-devel] New owl pattern.
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 15:39:19 -0400

This OWL pattern solves the following (new) test case:

loadsgf games/trevor/trevor_32.sgf
320 gg_genmove black
#? [J2]*

(SGF file contents at end of this e-mail.

I have two questions:
GnuGo 3.1.8 claims:
Move at J2 strategically or tactically unsafe
Move at J3 owl-defends G5
How does it determine that J2 is unsafe?

After applying the following pattern, GnuGo now decides:
Move at J2 owl-defends G5
Move at J3 strategically or tactically unsafe
Now, why did J3 become unsafe?


Here's the pattern (added to owl_defendpats.db):

Pattern Dtrevor

OOX|          corner tesuji
O.O|
O..|
O.*|
...|
---+

:8,-,value(50)


Now, I don't think we'd want to add it as is, but probably make
it a bit more generic, and I don't know about the value either.
Besides, it has a silly name!

-Trevor

trevor_32.sgf:
(
;
FF[4]
GM[1]
SZ[9]
AP[Jago:Version 4.18]
AW[ch][dh][eh][fd][ff][fg][fh][gd][hd][id][ie][ed][ee][be][de][cd][ae][dc][e
b][ea][cg][cf][ci][ce][fc][fb]
AB[ge][gf][gg][gh][he][if][ad][bd][cc][bb][db][da][bc][ba][ga][gb][gc][hc][i
c][ib][ha][bi][bh][bg][bf][af][ah]
GN[x]
)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]