[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] (no subject)
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] (no subject) |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 00:31:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Arend wrote:
> Here is my list of tests in strategy?.tst that I disagree with (I looked
> through all those where GnuGo fails). (Some overlap with Trevor's
> recent patch in strategy4.tst.)
Thanks. There is one comment I don't agree with though, see below.
> Further down are my suggested patches for the .tst-file (pls tell me if
> I should use other format for your patch; I used diff -Naur and all patches
> are relative to 3.1.13).
No problem with the patch format. Patches against current CVS are
usually better, but against the latest release is good enough.
> Strategy2.tst:
>
> 68: D13 kills, too.
Does it? To me it looks like white D13, black F14 leaves black with
E13 and M16 as miai to make a second eye to go with the one at A15.
White can do no better than to pick up a tail of the dragon then.
/Gunnar
Re: [gnugo-devel] (no subject), Gunnar Farneback, 2001/11/08
Re: [gnugo-devel] (no subject), Daniel Bump, 2001/11/09
[gnugo-devel] (no subject), Arend Bayer, 2001/11/09
[gnugo-devel] (no subject), Inge Wallin, 2001/11/27