[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:03:46 -0800 |
> > The biggest obstacle is speed. The schemes I have in mind would be
> > too slow currently and also require multiple GNU Go processes
> > communicating by unix pipes so there will be portability
> > problems. So when this stuff is ready to go into the engine it will
> > have to be a configure option turned off by default.
>
> But then the different processes do not share caches/persistent caches
> etc? (Or else if you want one process with different threads, then
> we will probably have to rewrite a lot of stuff to clashes.)
The process inherits the caches from the parent when it forks. Since I'm
thinking about semilocal search, the persistent cache is less important.
> I think the main problems are the same. Your metamachine basically knows
> nothing about strategic effects, atari-atari moves etc. Also it does
> not use the fine tuned influence code as far as I understand.
We need to rewrite gtp_experimental_score to use the influence code.
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, bump, 2002/11/01
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Trevor Morris, 2002/11/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/07