RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix

[Portela Fernand]

I wrote:

> I guess something got forgotten in D509. The question is, since the
> pattern was disabled due to the bug, is it worth re-enabling it ?

Apparently, yes. If I'm not mistaken, it causes following breakage :

./regress.sh . trevorb.tst
160 FAILED: Correct '1 ..*', got '0'
./regress.sh . trevor.tst
360 FAILED: Correct '(2|3) J9', got '1 E9'

I prefer to know that we still have these problems.

And

./regress.sh . strategy3.tst
105 PASSED

If it's correct (I haven't checked carefully), then it looks very good to
me.

/nando