Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch

[bump]

> > It's correct that this is the missing block. However, as I said,
> > it should be :
> 
> OK, I checked that with that change it compiles and there are
> no unexpected fails in owl.tst.
> 
> I posted the corrected patch at:
> 
> http://sporadic.stanford.edu/bump/gnugo/patches/cosmic_5_1.2a
> 
> Dan

After the patch, the regression results are ALMOST the same as
the current CVS. There is one exception, and unexpected pass in
nngs3:

390 unexpected PASS!

An unexpected pass is of course not bad but do we understand 
why the results are different?

Dan