Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch

[Arend Bayer]

Dan wrote:

> > I posted the corrected patch at:
> >
> > http://sporadic.stanford.edu/bump/gnugo/patches/cosmic_5_1.2a
> >
> > Dan
>
> After the patch, the regression results are ALMOST the same as
> the current CVS. There is one exception, and unexpected pass in
> nngs3:
>
> 390 unexpected PASS!
>
> An unexpected pass is of course not bad but do we understand
> why the results are different?

Are you sure you used otherwise identical versions? I get that PASS
in CVS, too.

Arend