[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:13:37 +0300 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.50 |
Arend wrote:
>
> > > Still, I got only <15% of CPU time for a gnugo that I had explicitly
> > > compiled with -pg and -lc_p.
> >
> > I don't understand. Do you mean the profiler eats 85% of CPU time?
>
> Sorry, I meant libc got less than 15% CPU time.
>
> > And what is the `c_p' library? The profiler library?
>
> c_p is the glibc compiled with -pg, usually available in a package called
> 'glibc-profile'. Linking against that instead of standard glibc means
> that the C library calls made by gnugo will be included in the gprof
> output.
OK, then what it surprising in `glibc' getting < 15% CPU time?
Paul
- [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Gunnar Farneback, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Evan Daniel, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/20