[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:05:57 +0300 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.50 |
Arend wrote:
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> > OK, then what it surprising in `glibc' getting < 15% CPU time?
>
> Oh dear, I must be pretty bad in explaining. It is weird that it got 50%
> in one case and <15% in another. Both compiled with -pg.
I tend to dismiss this weirdness as I don't trust edited `Makefile's,
sorry ;)
Btw, why did you use some `oprofile' (what is that at all?) I thought
`-pg' was meant to create profiling information suitable for `gprof'.
Or is it some general format? In any case, `gprof' gives you call
tree, unlike `oprofile' as it seems from your messages.
Paul
- [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] weird performance problem,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Gunnar Farneback, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Evan Daniel, 2004/04/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] oprofile, Arend Bayer, 2004/04/20