|
From: | David Hill |
Subject: | Re: [gnuspeech-contact] {Spam?} Monet manual vs. gnustep Monet |
Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:57:58 -0700 |
Hi Paul, Sorry for the delay in responding. The end of April is not a good time for dealing with anything important other than Canadian income tax!! On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Paul Tyson wrote:
A task that is much appreciated.
It would be best to treat the existing Mac OS X version as definitive, but the GNUStep version is supposed to be logically the same, although -- naturally -- the GNUStep version does not use the Aqua interface. Ultimately, a separate manual is required for each of GNUStep and Mac OS X, where the text should be pretty well the same, but the screen shots differ.
That would be a perfectly reasonable approach.
Monet was improved during the port. The GNUStep version is the improved version.
You would be doing exactly the right thing.
As noted, apart from the screen shots, the Mac OS X version and GNUStep versions are supposed to be identical. The existing Monet manual uses screen shots taken directly from a NeXT and represent the original version which stays for the NeXT (anyone still running a NeXT apart from me :-), but is superseded for the ported versions where the operations are ordered and controlled in a slightly different, hopefully better, way. There may be changes in the future, but the manual is designed to editable -- right? HTH david Simplicity, patience, compassion. These three are your greatest treasures (Tao Te Ching #67) --------- |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |