Re: [Gomp-discuss] GOMP Requirements

[Lars Segerlund]

 Perhaps we should have a document page on the website ?

 / Lars Segerlund.

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:36:25 +0100
Biagio Lucini <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Friday 05 November 2004 20:38, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What a week...
> >
> > Here's the GOMP Requirements document. I'm certain I've forgotten
> > something, and I'm sure people will find a few typos and other problems.
> >
> > All considered comments are welcome.
> >
> 
> Hi Scott, thanks for the document, it is a very thorough summary. I would 
> suggest that when you specify OpenMP 2.0 as a target you also leave open the 
> option of targeting furher releases. With OpenMP 3.0 knocking at the door, I 
> think it would make sense to switch as soon as we are allowed.
> 
> I also agree we must document as much as possible, possibly all the code. 
> This 
> should alleviate the pains of people joining the project at a later stage.
> 
> > Where do we want to put these documents in the GOMP tree?
> >
> 
> What about a link from our webpages? I think it is the place where it would 
> make more sense.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Biagio
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss