[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems
From: |
Richard Graham |
Subject: |
Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:26:42 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130109 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Thanks for your quick response.
I tried the other distribution patterns with the same result. Although
for some the density parameter at which it stops working is even lower.
It seems the most likely thing is that I am getting NaNs because the
tracer can't find any intercepts for some reason, or some of the
intercepts are NaN. It seems I should be able to check that with
something like:
spot.get_tracer().get_trace_result().get_intercepted(image).size()
although that crashes when I run it, even at low density when the spot
analysis works.
Any ideas?
--
Richard
On 02/14/2013 12:26 PM, Alexandre Becoulet wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2013 10:48:49 Richard Graham wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> If you could give me some hints as to how to proceed in debugging this I
>> would appreciate it.
>
> We need to find where the NaNs first appear in the computation.
> Did you try other distribution patterns?
>
- [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Richard Graham, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Alexandre Becoulet, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems,
Richard Graham <=
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Alexandre Becoulet, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Richard Graham, 2013/02/15
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Alexandre Becoulet, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Richard Graham, 2013/02/18
- Re: [Goptical] spot analysis problems, Alexandre Becoulet, 2013/02/18