[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress! |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:39:12 -0800 |
Yo Eric!
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:31:12 -0500
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The real problem is that it's trying to stomp on something gpsd is
> > using. The errors above are just the symptom.
>
> Right. If the segments were the same size you wouldn't have this
> problem. It's only going to come up in the wake of a change that
> breaks compatibility with older versions of struct gps_device_t.
Partly. Compile options also change the size.
But, since this is the test code, are not the gpsd and test harness
compiled at the same time? With the same options? Thus there should be
no size conflict. Ever.
As long as the test shmid is cleaned up after the tests are done.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701
address@hidden Tel:+1(541)382-8588
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10