[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress! |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:14:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Gary E. Miller <address@hidden>:
> Which should not be a problem. Having the production gpsd use the
> same shmid as the test gpsd causes many problems. Not the least of
> which is test adta leaking into the production data.
> >
> > > As long as the test shmid is cleaned up after the tests are done.
> >
> > Hm. Should I move the segment removal to the end of the test
> > sequence? Right now it's done first.
>
> Maybe both? And double check you have not the same shmid as the prodcution
> gpsd.
What I've done is implemented and documented a GPSD_SHM_KEY
environment variable that overrides the default GPSD_KEY value
everywhere it's used - three places, the daemon's shm export code, the
library's code for the other end, and gpsctl's -R option to remove the
segment.
SConstruct sets this variable to a non-default value as part of the
execution environment for the tests. That should solve the problem.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, (continued)
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10