grammatica-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Grammatica-users] Impact + grammatica = true?


From: Iain McGinniss
Subject: Re: [Grammatica-users] Impact + grammatica = true?
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:39:08 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

If you're looking about for Java parser generators, you may also want to take a look at SableCC:

http://sablecc.org/

It generates very strongly typed parse trees, which can be useful in certain situations (and a nuisance in others). Having said that however, Grammatica was a good match for my project so it's worth considering both.

Cheers,
Iain McGinniss

Jonas Forssell wrote:
Hello,

I'm part of a team of developers for Impact (http://impact.sf.net).

First of all, let me congratulate you on the simplicity of grammatica. I had a look at JavaCC but was soon lost in the examples - mixing grammar and code. grammatica seems much cleaner.

We need to extend Impact with more interfaces. First step will be a parser for IGES graphical format (http://www.nist.gov/iges/)

This format consists of four main blocks (Start, Global, Directory, and Property) where some have fixed formats and some use separators.

I'm concidering using grammatica as the basis for all future Impact parsers. Will it be able to cope with advanced file structures such as IGES?

Thanks
/Jonas Forssell, Gothenburg, Sweden

________________________________________________________________________________
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended 
solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please remove it 
and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and 
attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any 
responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds. The 
views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect the views 
of the organisation
as a whole.
________________________________________________________________________________
Graham Technology plc                                                
http://www.grahamtechnology.com
________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment: Iain.McGinniss.vcf
Description: Vcard


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]