[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent'
From: |
m hobgood |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent' |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:53:16 -0600 |
Michail,
I use a Laserjet 4050 for all of my output. It takes postscript
directly.
In four years of operation with it and groff produced output, I've
had no
problems. I also use gv to display the groff output prior to
printing. So, at
least from my perspective, postscript is alive and well.
Werners remark that they are just updating incorrect afm files does
make
me smile :).
Cordially,
Michael Hobgood
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Clarke Echols, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Miklos Somogyi, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Deri James, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent',
m hobgood <=