groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal


From: Steffen Nurpmeso
Subject: Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:06:54 +0200
User-agent: s-nail v14.7.5-17-g63cbe6f

well, hello nonetheless,

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
 |> Do you need any additional help in testing this?

 |A major test would be the OS X platform, since it tends to have (a)
 |missing a lot of functionality, and (b) use LLVM, not gcc, as the
 |compiler.

There should be a note that on Snow Leopard you have to set $CXX
to an upgrade compiler -- the developer-toold shipped `Apple clang
version 1.7 (tags/Apple/clang-77) (based on LLVM 2.9svn)' bails:

  checking whether wcwidth works reasonably in UTF-8 locales... no
  checking that C++ compiler can compile simple program... no

  configure: error: a working C++ compiler is required

`clang version 3.4 (branches/release_34 197314)' as well as
`gcc-mp-4.8 (MacPorts gcc48 4.8.2_0) 4.8.2' manage it.  Doesn't
matter anyway, this system is no longer supported and even may
usage of it will become as extinct as the beautiful cat itself.
Let me say at least once and finally that i personally consider

  address@hidden groff.git]$ du -s gnulib
  57548   gnulib

a boldness, especially given that the single function that is used
from that library is used faulty, and the replacement on the bug
tracker is a few hundred byte object code.  But that imbalance
will surely become smaller over time.
Ciao,



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]