Re: [Gtktalog-devel] XML tests

[Toni Van Remortel]

On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 20:43, Yves Mettier wrote:
> > They are included in the Calc sheet. Now I also made a HTML version
> > (http://www.nokelu.be/tmp/test_results.html).
> > I redid the Gzip tests with the -9 option, to have a better result.
> 
> There is one result that I would like to know more about: the mdk9.0 test.
> How can you get such a difference, and how can I get so close results ?
> result = (xml.gz - gtktalog) / xml.gz
> result (you) = 40 %
> result (me) = 2.5 %
> 
> Of course we are not testing the same catalogs: I have "mdk cooker 
> main+contrib+plf" and
> you have "mdk 9.0 main". But we both have catalogs with lots of RPMS, so 
> either you
> would get something between 1% and 5%, or I would get someting between 30% 
> and 50%
> Why do we have so different results ?

I think it's the HTML documentation on the main ISO's that makes the
difference.

> When the XML stuff looks good, I will start to implement it, then commit to 
> the CVS, and
> then everybody will be able to improve it (I will commit something very basic 
> of course,
> to commit as soon as possible :)

Nice. I'm fighting with the DTD, it isn't getting as I thought (and
posted). I'll take a look at it later (next week, I'm affraid).
-- 
Toni Van Remortel <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part