[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am |
Date: |
09 Jun 2001 13:31:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
Neil> Are there any other names similar to `stamp-vti' and
Neil> `stamp-vti1' in the generated Makefile.in? (These file
Neil> names aren't documented at all in the manual.)
Tom> You aren't supposed to use them. What is it that you're
Tom> trying to do?
Good question; I don't really know. (For the version-tutorial.texi
target, I just copied what was already there for version.texi.) The
relevant section from Makefile.am is commented like this:
----------------------------------------------
# This rule overrides automake's rule for version.texi. It causes
# version.texi to be created even in non-maintainer-mode.
$(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
@:
# And the same for version-tutorial.texi.
$(srcdir)/version-tutorial.texi: stamp-vti1
@:
----------------------------------------------
Does that make any sense to you?
Neil
New auto tools, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/09
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/09
- Re: New auto tools, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Dale P. Smith, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/10