Re: guile-statprof now available as a cvs module.

[Rob Browning]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> I don't know why we have the extra "guile" directory in CVS, and it
> feels somewhat wrong to me.  Should we hoist all `submodules' up one
> level?  That will certainly cause a lot of hick-ups, and therefore
> probably isn't worth it.  For consistency, having all modules in the
> "guile" directory is the right thing, I'd say.  There certainly
> doesn't exist the notion that modules inside "guile" are more
> official than the ones on top-level.

I'm confused.  I thought there was a guile CVS directory that
contained guile-core, guile-www, etc., and I was trying to put my
module there, alongside guile-www.  However, when I checked it in, and
then updated my top-level checkout, I didn't see it.  I presumed that
was because there was some CVS "modules" funny-business going on, but
did I in fact put my dir in the wrong place?

Thanks


-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD