[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling BUGS.
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Handling BUGS. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:39:10 -0800 |
From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
Date: 25 Mar 2002 23:31:02 +0100
Because the new mechanism was quickly done, and made so much sense,
mostly.
in that case i will add these bugs shortly:
- subject: Guile fails tests on Tru64 4.0F
- subject: failed backtrace
since they manifest in 1.6 and i've started looking into them. i take
it we can use whatever conventions we want? i'm going to try to stick
w/ something like NUMBER-NP-VP (noun phrase, verb phrase), w/ NUMBER
starting at 1000. maybe other people will use this convention, too.
i've added "scan mailing list archives for bugs" to tasks/TODO, also.
thi
- Re: Handling BUGS., (continued)
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/24
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Marius Vollmer, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/25
- Re: Handling BUGS.,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Handling BUGS., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/22
- Re: Handling BUGS., Rob Browning, 2002/03/22