[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_make_gsubr question
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: scm_make_gsubr question |
Date: |
20 Jan 2003 09:58:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > - The corresponding operation on the Scheme level is achieved much
> > more elegantly by closure.
>
> [...]
>
> > - The most sensible approach IMO for a Guile-based application is to
> > do the minimum possible in C for the maximum benefit in Scheme.
>
> I tend to agree. I wonder how often a user_data solution would be
> better than restructuring the problem...
However, when his patch is nice and clean, we can have it both! We do
already have 'compiled closures', but I think they are a bit
obscure...
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405