[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Sam Tregar |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2001 16:57:55 -0400 (EDT) |
On 10 May 2001, Rob Browning wrote:
> Note that unless I'm misunderstanding you, this probably doesn't have
> a lot to do with the gh_ interface. The "interpreter independence"
> claim for the gh_ interface, I believe meant independence from any
> particular quirks of Aubrey Jaffer's SCM implementation of Scheme from
> which Guile's interpreter originally came.
Ah, ok. The intent I read into RMS's plans were that a given C program
could use Guile and instantly support people writing extensions in a
number of "Guile-compatible" syntaxes. This requires a C-interface that
doesn't care what particiular interpreter is being used to parse the code.
Perhaps that's what the gh_ interface could be? It's certainly a long way
from being that now. It would probably end up looking more like SWIG than
scm_...
-sam
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/05
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Bill Gribble, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Evan Prodromou, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Sam Tregar <=
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Ken Fox, 2001/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jürgen A. Erhard, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/12
- more on continuations, Bill Schottstaedt, 2001/05/12