[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Jürgen A. Erhard |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2001 16:58:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.5 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) |
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Read <address@hidden> writes:
Jeff> I don't know how the Guile developers feel but it seems to me as
Jeff> though Microsoft .NET got there sooner, and did it better. At least,
Jeff> that's the perception, as everybody and their brother (even the Perl
Jeff> and Python guys) are rallying behind .NET as THE cross-platform,
Jeff> language-agnostic development solution. (There is even a .NET Scheme
Jeff> implementation somewhere...)
The Python guys are rallying behind `.NET'? Where did you get this
from?
AFAICT, *some* Python guys (all of those working on Windows platforms)
*like* `.NET'. *All* of Python? Not by a long shot...
Python is pretty multi-platform already, not much urgent need for
`.NET' here.
Bye, J
PS: It follows that "Everybody and their brother" is of course
patently false... for one, *I'm* not rallying behind it... I won't
even use it unless there's a free implementation for Linux. And my
brother isn't even in the computer business... :-)
--
Jürgen A. Erhard address@hidden phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326
My WebHome: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard
"Perl Programmers are from Mars,
Python Programmers are from Yorkshire" -- Alex in c.l.py
pgpCpebRv9oHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Ken Fox, 2001/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Jürgen A. Erhard <=
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/12
- more on continuations, Bill Schottstaedt, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/13
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/14