[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
12 May 2001 12:39:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
John Fitzgerald <address@hidden> writes:
> NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail message and any
> attachments is confidential to Pavilion Technologies, Inc. or one of its
> subsidiaries and may contain proprietary information or be legally
> privileged. This message and any attachments are intended only for the
> personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s). If you are not
> the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have recieved this
> message in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message and any attachments is unauthorized and strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me
> immediately by telephone and electronic mail, and delete this message, any
> attachments, and all copies thereof. Thank you very much
I believe this means that your contributions for this list are not
appropriate for a public list, or inclusion in a free software
project....
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/13
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/15
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/15
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/16
RE: To gh_ or not to gh_?, John Fitzgerald, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
RE: To gh_ or not to gh_?, John Fitzgerald, 2001/05/13