[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2001 19:32:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:42:10AM +1200, John Fitzgerald wrote:
: > : NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail message and any
: > : attachments is confidential to Pavilion Technologies, Inc. or one of its
: > : subsidiaries and may contain proprietary information or be legally
: > : privileged. This message and any attachments are intended only for the
: > : personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s). If you are
not
: > : the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
: > : intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have recieved this
: > : message in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or
: > : copying of this message and any attachments is unauthorized and strictly
: > : prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me
: > : immediately by telephone and electronic mail, and delete this message, any
: > : attachments, and all copies thereof. Thank you very much
: >
: > I believe this means that your contributions for this list are not
: > appropriate for a public list, or inclusion in a free software
: > project....
:
: Good point! Unfortunately this disclaimer gets appended to every outgoing
: e-mail automatically whether or not it's appropriate.
You can tell your company executives that it didn't make the cut this year:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/19057.html
Better luck next time :)
Lars J
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/15
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/15
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/16
RE: To gh_ or not to gh_?, John Fitzgerald, 2001/05/11
RE: To gh_ or not to gh_?, John Fitzgerald, 2001/05/13
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Lars J. Aas <=