[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Tomas Zerolo |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:17:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:04:58 +0000
>
> We could enforce this by [...]
> I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts (again).
>
> if your design requires enforcement, [...]
Neil considered enforcement, but dismissed it in favor of convention.
That's one fo the things I liked about his proposal.
perlis sez: simplicty follows complexity.
That seems to be THE Alan Perlis (in response to a question later in the
thread).
Regards
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/22
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Tomas Zerolo <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/14