[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:54:44 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> In practice I would guess not. Most distribution-managed packages
> would go into /usr/share/guile, and most home-built packages into
> /usr/local/share/guile, I'd guess. What is your concern, though?
Mainly that I think you can get what you want from adding /usr/local
to the default path, and then leave it up to distros to patch if they
want further locations.
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Kevin Ryde <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/14
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/17
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/17
- Search path for C libraries, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/18
- Re: Search path for C libraries, Vorfeed Canal, 2005/10/18