Re: Reproducible profiles

[宋文武]

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> David Thompson <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
>> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
>> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
>> that reads in a package list from a Scheme file and creates a new
>> generation of the profile with only those packages are installed.
>> Here's an example configuration:
>>
>>     (use-modules (gnu))
>>     (use-package-modules base less guile emacs admin ruby mail pumpio man)
>>     
>>     (list ruby
>>           coreutils
>>           less
>>           man-db
>>           notmuch
>>           guile-2.0
>>           emacs
>>           dmd
>>           offlineimap
>>           pumpa)
>
> Yes, that sounds very useful.
>
> As usual though, there’s the issue of multiple-output packages.  The
> above snippet is nice, but doesn’t allow you to specify a particular
> output of a package.
>
> What about instead requiring people to return a manifest:
>
>   (use-modules (guix profiles))
>   (use-package-modules base emacs guile)
>
>   (manifest (cons (package->manifest-entry gcc-toolchain "debug")
>                   (map package->entry
>                        (list gcc-toolchain emacs guile-2.0))))
>
> That means we’ll have to document (guix profiles).
>
> It’s more verbose than what you suggest, though.  If you insist ;-), we
> could allow a list of packages instead of a manifest, though I’d prefer
> not to do that.
>
> WDYT?
>
+1 for return 'manifest', in a same way as 'operating-system'.
And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:

  (manifest
    (map package-specification->manifest-entry
         '("emacs"
           "font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))