[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:35:41 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès (2015-08-26 00:12 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Thompson, David (2015-08-14 17:40 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>>> depending on Magit is too heavy a dependency.
>>
>> It does not depend on the whole Magit but only on a single
>> "magit-popup.el" file which may be installed separately (available on
>> Melpa, for example). So potentially we can make a package just for this
>> library and use it.
>>
>> However, according to its manual¹, it will be superseded by a general
>> library which will not be a part of magit, so eventually it will be a
>> light-weight dependency I think.
>>
>> Anyway, we already have a heavy dependency for Emacs interface (Geiser).
>
> Yes, but Geiser is an “obvious” one that cannot be avoided.
>
> I haven’t tested wip-emacs-popup-ui yet because I have yet to switch to
> Magit 2 (I’m slightly afraid of breaking my workflow, maybe unreasonably
> so!).
Magit2 broke my workflow completely when I switched to it several months
ago, and it took some time to set it up for my needs.
> That said, since the functionality is in a separate file, people who
> don’t have magit-popup.el can just choose to not use M-x guix while
> still being available to use the other features, right?
Yes. I think I'll mention in the manual that it is an optional
dependency used for “M-x guix”.
>>> I noticed an 'e' for 'environment'. I imagine that's just a placeholder. ;)
>>
>> Not really, all commands (including 'environment') are ready to use.
>> You just specify the options you want in the magit manner and then you run
>> "Execute" action. And the specified command is executed in Guix REPL.
>>
>> Specifically for 'environment' it may lead to a very interesting result
>> as it will spawn an external process, unless --dry-run or --search-paths
>> options were specified. But still it will… let's say… work, but only if
>> a user is brave enough to try it ;)
>
> :-)
>
> It Would Be Nice to have, say, M-x guix-compile-in-environment, which
> would be like M-x compile but just run the thing in ‘guix environment’.
> Just thought I’d mention this in passing. ;-)
Yes, I remember about emacs+environment wishes, but I don't promise
anything :-(
>> Also along with "execute in REPL" action I'm going to add 2 more default
>> actions for each command:
>>
>> - "execute in shell" — this will be a complete alternative to writing a
>> full command manually in a shell buffer.
>>
>> - "copy the command line" — i.e., to put the specified command arguments
>> into kill ring, so later a user could do with it whatever he wants.
>
> (he or she)
>
> Sounds like more exciting stuff ahead!
If you mean those 2 actions, they were implemented a couple of days
later.
> Thanks for your creativity & hack power!
Thank you very much!
--
Alex
- "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Alex Kost, 2015/08/14
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/25
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Alex Kost, 2015/08/26
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/28
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Alex Kost, 2015/08/28
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/29
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Alex Kost, 2015/08/30
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/30
- Re: "M-x guix" - magit-like interface for guix commands, Alex Kost, 2015/08/30