[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan for 0.9.0
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Plan for 0.9.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:27:36 +0200 |
Alex Vong <address@hidden> writes:
> Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all
> the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper
> way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d <DIRECTORY>". Perhaps we should
> change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to
> "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable?
I think this is not a bad idea. It would also make “guix gc” behave
more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument).
It’s not a command that’s used so often that the additional argument
would hurt much, in my opinion.
~~ Ricardo
- Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/12
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Daniel Pimentel, 2015/10/13
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Eric Bavier, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Thompson, David, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Thompson, David, 2015/10/15