Re: Gnome-updates

[宋文武]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> the gnome-updates branch has built on x86, and compared to master, there are
>> not that many regressions:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/108921?compare=master#tabs-now-fail
>
> In fact this slightly overestimates the failures compared to master; in
> particular, all the Octave/Fltk-related failures are already in master.
>
>> I saw a few that seem to be related to fonts and freetype, but I am not
>> a specialist. Do you think we could nevertheless merge back to master?
>> In any case, it would be nice if people who are competent in these matters
>> could have a look at the few remaining build failures.
>
> Since ‘make assert-binaries-available’ passed, I went ahead and merge
> the branch.
Oh, luckily the merge doesn't have effect.
>
> If anything goes wrong, please let us know!
Sorry, this is still not ready yet!  I have skip a gjs test temporary,
and disable the spell plugin of gedit.  I'd continue to work on the
gnome-updates branch, and will reply to this thread when it's ok.