guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling on CentOS 7.


From: Tomáš Čech
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling on CentOS 7.
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:53:36 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-06-11)

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:34:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
>
> > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see a way to apply this patch "on the CentOS side" except for
> > > waiting (another two or three years) until they upgrade Automake.
> >
> > When packaging guix for CentOS, just add a patch to the source package
> > definition..
>
> I do not intend to create an RPM package for CentOS, I am merely trying
> to do the following:
>  git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
>  cd guix
>  ./bootstrap
>  ./configure
>  make

I see, I haven't thought about that...

But, in that case, wouldn't be creating guix RPM package for CentOS even
more beneficial alternative (making it easy for all CentOS7 users...)?

Best regards,

S_W

That would require keeping it up-to-date.

Actually I think that this particular patch could be replaced by
script snippet (untested) in spec:

for dir in doc emacs gnu nix; do
  sed "address@hidden@address@hidden" "${dir}/local.mk"
done

Furthermore, it requires usually fix once per release - when user run
`guix pull', it becomes irrelevant what is user running (but daemon
changes).

I must say I'm impressed by the effort to fully maintain CentOS 7 to
2020. If you don't want to go package way (which I think is
prefferable) I'm not against the reverting patch anymore. 


Best regards,

S_W

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]