Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

ng0 <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
>> related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
>> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.
>
> Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?

I just checked the git log but couldn’t find a similar package in which
changes of this magnitude were summarised in one commit.

I suggest splitting this up.  Actually, though, I think the description
doesn’t need changing.  I only suggested removing the sentence because I
assumed that the package didn’t yet exist.  There’s no harm in keeping
it.

Without the description change it’s really just one thing that has been
changed:

    gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.

    * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
      "patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
      target instead of "default".

What do you think?

~~ Ricardo