Re: jquery 3.1.1

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hey,

Mike Gerwitz <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 21:48:44 +0100, Catonano wrote:
>> Anyway, now I have a COMPLETE graph of the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1
>>
>> It's made of
>> 47311 vertices and
>> 324569 edges
>
> lol...
>
>> Anyway, these broken packages pose a challenge to the mission of porting
>> Jquery into Guix, in my opinion,
>
> My greater concern is verifying licenses: that'd have to be considered
> in the DAG (...I hope it's a DAG; who knows what those node packages
> might be doing!) to flag potential problems.  The JS community is pretty
> lax on licensing (in both the permissive sense and the I-don't-care
> sense); the license might not be correct or might be missing
> entirely.  Or might not match what's in the source files.
>
> Verifying that many dependencies is going to be a challenge for an
> automated system; we'd want humans to look at many of them too to make
> sure things aren't fishy. :x  The problem is that one single dependency
> that's mischaracterized as free---even if it's one of the
> single-function packages---can destroy an entire project (e.g. jQuery).

Indeed, that’s terrible.

(One could argue that single-function packages are “trivial” from a
copyright standpoint.  Then the subset of the npm repo containing those
trivial packages could be viewed as a database of “facts” (which, in
some jurisdiction, is covered by a “sui generis” right disjoint from
copyright.))

>> One last fun fact: while I was watching the output flowing in my terminal,
>> I saw a package called
>>
>> "broccoli-funnel"
>
> Ah, they missed a really good logo opportunity!

:-)

Ludo’.