Re: [rgui-dev] Backend Debouch

[Tom Sawyer]

quick clarification: ParaGUI worked better then i thought! i reinstalled
from scratch with leon's fix and everything worked very well - only the
font/alignment seemed a little screwy. so chalk another one up to
ParaGUI.

~transami


On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 02:05, Tom Sawyer wrote:
> finally, there's ParaGUI/Ruby. The bindings for this are flying along
> and looking good. That's a very good sign. ParaGUI itself though is
> still a bit of a youngster. Leon has it working fairly well, but my test
> caused my system to slow to a crawl. obviosuly there are some bugs in
> ParaGUI itself that need working out. Currently the version is 1.0.2. so
> i don't expect it to be up to par until, say, 1.2, which could take some
> time to reach.
> 
> so that looks to be the lay of land. please express your opinions on
> what i've said here. what kind of time frames do you expect on these
> developing GUIs?
> 
> so, we have to make some choices. should we use a GTK or FOX or both
> backends now in order to get GUtopIa "out the door" sometime soon? or
> should we patiant and wait for the others to develop? then there is the
> general question of which to support. All of them? or should we focus on
> just one? or just a few?
> 
> thoughts, please.
> 
> ~transami
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gutopia-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutopia-dev
> 
-- 
~transami