Re: [Gzz-commits] gzz doc/pegboard/bug_test--tjl/peg.rst test/tes...

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> 
> >Log message:
> >     Implement bug_test -- there was already some discussion and we need 
> >     this *NOW*.
> > 
> >
> 
> You have not replied to this, though:
> 
> I wrote:
> 
> >Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> >
> >>    * What conventions should there be for encoding the failing of tests?
> >>+   
> >>+    RESOLVED: A bit like rfc822. Extensibility.
> >> 
> >>
> >
> >I'd prefer reStructuredText field lists, i.e.
> >
> >   :fail: AWT
> >
> >reST is meant to be used in docstrings, rfc822 isn't (esp. at a point 
> >other than the beginning of the docstring).

Ouch, missed that.

Ok, should we PEG bug_test_rst?

        Tuomas