Re: [Gzz] ``bug_test_rst--benja``: Marking failing tests to use ReST

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
>  
>
> > =============================================================
> > ``bug_test_rst--benja``: Marking failing tests to use ReST
> > =============================================================
> >
> > :Author:       Benja Fallenstein
> > :Last-Modified: $Date: 2002/11/22 10:49:04 $
> > :Revision:     $Revision: 1.1 $
> > :Status:       Current
> >
> >
> > Tuomas' "`Handling Bugs`_" PEG specifies that an RFC 2822-like
> > syntax should be used to mark failing PEGs. However,
> >    
>
> Hmm... probably it would make sense to refer to PEGs by their unique
> id, as a principle?

Hmm... I don't like to have to use computerish ids instead of proper 
titles. OTOH, seeing the PEG id quickly helps in plain-text reading... I 
don't know, maybe

. "Handling Bugs" [bug_test--tjl] specifies...

and make it so that ReST links [bug_test--tjl] to the appropriate PEG. 
Or alternately,

. [bug_test--tjl: Handling Bugs] specifies...

Not sure.

- Benja