[Heartlogic-dev] cue (was Re: parameterizing)

[Joshua N Pritikin]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:38:37PM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> I think we are misunderstanding each other.

Quite possible.

> Clark Elliot uses the term emotion eliciting condition.
> 
> I use the term cue or scenario cue as, one might say, a specific type of
> emotion eliciting condition.  Or one might say, an experimentally
> operationalizable or experimentally controllable emotion eliciting
> condition.

Oh!

So "cue" is _your_ shorthand (& refinement) for "emotion eliciting
condition".

> Hey, look, Bill of the Past meets Bill of the Present...Here is
> the entry in the glossary:
> 
> \item{{\bf Scenario Cue:} A term created for the purposes of this
> dissertation to refer to an emotion eliciting condition, a situation
> which provokes an emotional response, or at least is a candidate for
> provoking such a response.  All scenario cues have two parts, an
> overriding goal (see also) and an outcome (see also).  I chose the
> term ``scenario cue'' in order to emphasize that it is merely a cue
> for an appraisal. Scenario cues can be refered to by item ids, e.g. a1
> or d3.  But also identifiers such as a1b1 are used to identify
> scenario cues.  Note that item a1 and item b1 share the same scenario
> cue.  Thus, the convention I follow is that this scenario cue is
> called a1b1.  In Study1 Phase 2 and Study 2 scenario cues could be
> simple or complex.  In all other studies, scenario cues were always
> simple.  See also item.}

Just to double check: I can cite Clark Elliot for "emotion eliciting
condition" in the glossary entry for "cue"?

-- 
A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://openheartlogic.org